<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infrastructure changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thudfactor.com/infrastructure-changes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thudfactor.com/infrastructure-changes</link>
	<description>Better times collide with now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlankton</title>
		<link>http://www.thudfactor.com/infrastructure-changes/comment-page-1#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thudfactor.com/?p=1492#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I get very few comments due to the nature of my site&#8217;s focus. Maybe I&#8217;m not getting spammed as much because I&#8217;ve only been around for 8 weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get very few comments due to the nature of my site&#8217;s focus. Maybe I&#8217;m not getting spammed as much because I&#8217;ve only been around for 8 weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thudfactor</title>
		<link>http://www.thudfactor.com/infrastructure-changes/comment-page-1#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>thudfactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thudfactor.com/?p=1492#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I look through them regularly, but Akismet&#8217;s only had a false positive for me three or four times out of tens of thousands of spam messages. Not sure what your difference is, there, but it&#8217;s been fantastic for me.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I look through them regularly, but Akismet&#8217;s only had a false positive for me three or four times out of tens of thousands of spam messages. Not sure what your difference is, there, but it&#8217;s been fantastic for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlankton</title>
		<link>http://www.thudfactor.com/infrastructure-changes/comment-page-1#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thudfactor.com/?p=1492#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Be sure to look through your akismet held comments before hitting delete. Akismet is great, but it seems like about 25% of the stuff it catches are valid comments.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be sure to look through your akismet held comments before hitting delete. Akismet is great, but it seems like about 25% of the stuff it catches are valid comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diesel</title>
		<link>http://www.thudfactor.com/infrastructure-changes/comment-page-1#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>Diesel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thudfactor.com/?p=1492#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh.&#160; I guess I need to make some changes too.&#160; It&#8217;s always something.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.&nbsp; I guess I need to make some changes too.&nbsp; It&#8217;s always something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
