Actions speak louder than

September 25, 2004

The “new line of attack”:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45672-2004Sep23.html from the Bush-Cheney camp has entirely changed my mind. It just hadn’t occured to me how dangerous John Kerry really is, and how bad he would be for America. Especially in this dangerous time. Consider:

*Kerry’s words “embolden the enemy.”* My gosh, we can’t have that. Why, if Kerry were president he’d probably do something like “taunt the enemy to "bring it on"”:http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-07-02-bush-iraq-troops_x.htm. Also, The Decorated Soldier of Waffling might “do something _really_ stupid”:http://www.marinetimes.com/story.php?f=1-MARINEPAPER-356833.php like order troops to attack Falluja against advice then order a pull-out before the job is done, thus giving the impression that American forces are easily provoked but just as easily turned aside.

*Kerry’s words “undermine our men and women who are serving over there.”* Of course they do! Shortly after some campaign appearance or another, Kerry’s words so demoralized our soldiers that the “National Guard at Fort Dix was put on lockdown”:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31689-2004Sep18.html. Lesser humans might say that the low morale was the result of poor training, a military stretched too thin, back-door drafts, “threatening re-enlistment letters”:http://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/state/article/0,1299,DRMN_21_3185596,00.html, and a scary quagmire in Iraq where over 1,000 Americans have died looking for weapons that didn’t exist. But we know it was Kerry daring to question the president that caused this kind of misbehavior.

*Kerry’s words bring “comfort to America’s enemy.”* Oh my, yes. Because they know that under Kerry’s unsteady flippity-floppity leadership, he’s likely to pull resources out of Al Queda’s home turf (Afghanistan) in order to create more terrorists in places where “Al Queda isn’t”:http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/terrornet/12.htm.

Of course, we all know *Osama wants Kerry to win*. I mean, he simply doesn’t have the national security _cojones_ Bush has. Kerry’s irresponsible tax policies could sink us so far into debt we’d have to “plead poor to justify budget-cuts to First Responders”:http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4224556/. And Kerry’s French-looking face is sure to “alienate our allies”:http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/7335383.htm?1c because honestly, who likes the French? Certainly not our close traditional allies, the “Costa Ricans”:http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031777852771&path=!nationworld&s=1037645509161 and the “Polish”:http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=3153571&C=europe, who’s military might is so essential to our Quagmire Building in the Middle East. And the Terrorists will surely chortle with glee if the Democrats, well-known freedom-haters, win power. For they will do doubt “activate the Political Correctness _statsi_”:http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0820-04.htm and start calling disagreement with Presidential Authority “dangerously close to treason”:http://www.asmallvictory.net/archives/006414.html.

Yup, electing Kerry will surely destroy our military, weaken our security here at home, and finally put a stake through the heart of the cherished freedoms our soliders fought and died for.

God bless George W. Bush, who would _never ever ever_ allow such things to happen on his watch.

Posted in Politics